This paper was first printed
in 'Community Living' and is a great example of Gill Levy's
'down to earth' writing. Gill is respected as one of the
leading authorities and has many years experience of
working with visual loss and multiple disability. Thank you
to Gill for this paper.
David and
the glasses
We all had a soft spot for David's rather scatty mother. 'I
do me best, you know', she would say, 'but I was never the
brightest at school. Couldn't concentrate for long. But
I've all the time in the world for my son'. Everyone agreed
that he was 'a handful', but 'could be so loving and
affectionate at times'.
She would never allow him to sleep away from home. 'If I
can't cope with him, you lot won't, with all them other
disabled ones around', she would say. He would occasionally
'trash the environment', tearing soft furnishings and
curtains, and kick tables and chairs over. And he would
slap his face if one to one support was not available. As
he got older, taller and stronger - with a growing spurt
after he left school - he 'presented services with even
more of a challenge'.
Seeing David's bruised face and bitten hands, the new
centre announced 'Something must be done'. She approached
the Community Team for help - and along to the Centre came
'this nice young rookie psychologist', Judy, who asked lots
of questions and sat watching David for a morning. 'I want
an up to date sight and hearing test', Judy said. The staff
were disappointed - they had hoped for a 'behaviour
programme'.
Testing David's eyes took 'three goes' for the
gentle-mannered lady optometrist visiting the Centre -
David had to become familiar with a new person coming close
to him and shining a light into his eyes. 'Well, she said
with her hands on her hips to emphasise her words, 'this
young man literally can't see beyond the end of his nose.
Life must be hell for him - he's so shortsighted. He must
have glasses'. There was a chorus from the assembled staff,
'he'll won't wear them'.
The optometrist smiled knowingly. 'Don't assume! Most
people can be helped to accept glasses. You need to find
something to motivate him'. Two weeks later, she returned
with a pair of 'half strength glasses', explaining that it
might be months or even years before she could prescribe
ones which would 'give him the best possibly sight'.
'Spectacles will totally change his world', said the
optometrist. 'Think what it must be like to suddenly see
things you never knew were there! You have to introduce him
slowly to this strange new world so avoid frightening him'.
The frames were light, and David sat stock still when they
were placed on his face. We held our breath, expecting him
to 'explode' or throw them away, but a tea tray arrived for
the optometrist. David examined it carefully and then
watched his favourite staff member, Kathryn, leave the
room. He was unusually calm. 'I'd suggest you take the
specs off him now', said the optometrist 'but try putting
them back on when he has his tea, and then take them off
after a few minutes and build up wearing time during
activities he enjoys'.
David and Kathryn went into 'break'. She approached him,
calling his name and timidly announcing she was going to
put his glasses back on. She placed a cool cup of tea in
front of him, and we stood in silent amazement as David
looked at the cup and then at his right hand, which was
resting on the table. He watched his hand (as if it did not
belong to him) slowly moving towards the cup, using his
now-seeing eyes to direct his hand. He did not spill a
drop.
Saying 'biscuits, David?' I offered him a plate,
anticipating 'the usual performance' - him clumsily
grabbing at the plate, sending biscuits flying. But instead
he reached slowly and deliberately towards the plate,
helping himself cautiously. He grinned. We were transfixed.
It felt like 'a miracle' watching him have a second
biscuit. He had already realised that with his glasses on,
he could tell the round chocolate digestive biscuits from
the oblong Bourbon creams. His glasses had given him
choice.
Within a few weeks he had learned to use his hands for
quite 'delicate' things when he wore his glasses. We were
all so delighted by the way he so easily acquired new
skills, that we barely noticed the improvements in his
behaviour. Then his Mum dropped into the Centre one day and
asked: 'Who do I hug? I don't know what you've done to my
son, but he's a different person. It's wonderful'.
I questioned her closely. David would not be parted from
his glasses at home. 'Build up wearing time?' she said. 'I
have a fight to get them off him these days'. He no longer
needed to be lead around. 'The end of Mum abuse' she said,
because he would grip tightly and dig his fingernails into
her arms. He had become continent, finding his way to the
toilet by himself. He could now watch TV from his favourite
chair, and not stand with his nose on the screen. He no
longer needed 'half as much attention - and he was happy to
watch other people doing things'.
By his next six-monthly review most of his 'behaviour had
gone'. 'Of course', said his Mum, 'now he can do more and
more for himself, he doesn't get cross waiting for
attention'. He very occasionally slapped his face if he was
really frustrated (usually with good reason), and we
worried he might damage his glasses - but we no longer
thought of him as 'one of the difficult ones'. A year or so
later and we could not believe the difference and we told
the optometrist just how much we thought the glasses had
changed his life. She smiled.
David had been wearing glasses for several years when his
Mum rushed up to me in the street. 'Here, Gill. I don't
want you telling no one but… It wasn't just David that
needed glasses. I did too. I'm learning to read now - and
they thought I was stupid! On second thoughts, ducks, you
can tell the whole bloody world'.
No comments:
Post a Comment